
Before you guys answer this question, especially the males, you also have to picture if it was an underage woman having consensual sex with a adult male. So, do you think if a male under the age of 18 whom decides to have consensual sex with someone twice his age, would he be considered a "victim?"
The reason why this question came across is the how society portrays male and female relationships. For instance, if a 16-year-old boy had consensual sex with his mother's close friend who happens to be beautiful, if I was one of his friends, I would probably be shocked but at the same time, be amazed he had relations with a beautiful older woman. And I would probably be egging him on.
On the other hand, I wouldn't be too impressed if I knew a 16-year-old girl who had consensual sex with someone twice her age.
See how that works?
But it's almost as if society embedded that into our brains, or at least speaking as a guy.
Don't believe me? Well, remember that episode of South Park where I put a clip on here. Where Stan went to the police station to report that a female teacher was having sex with one of her underage students... the conclusion was the entire police station didn't see anything wrong with that and was laughing about the situation because they were all guys.
Well, the argument will always be there but according to the law and previous court hearings of underage males having consensual sex with their teachers or adults, the teenage boy is always considered the victim.
Now, if the teenage boy is 17 years 11 months and 28 days old, one or two days away from his 18th birthday and decides to have consensual sex with someone twice his age, now is he still considered the victim?
See, according to the law, you are an adult when you turn 18, right? But does those two days really make a difference between children and adults? I wouldn't think so. There will always be those grey areas.
But in today's society, those same boys who have consensual sex with an adult, I bet you a majority wouldn't think anything of it.